It took almost 5 years of litigation, but GM has finally decided to pay up for a significant problem it created in its cars. GM used an engine coolant in about 30 models of its cars which caused significant engine problems in these vehicles. As a result, owners were having to pay for repairs which were caused by a product GM choose to put in these cars. It started with model year 1995 and includes popular models Olds Cutlass and Chevy Impala. It is reported by the plaintiff’s attorneys representing the class that each consumer will recieve back about 50% of the cost of the repair due to the problematic engine coolant.
My only thought on this is why did this have to take so long? Almost 5 years of litigation when surely GM knew early on it had a problem it had to fix. And yes, it is reported that the plaintiff’s lawyers involved in this litigation will receive a fee that will be split among many lawyers and law firms of up to $16.5 million. But I promise you, the firms involved in defending GM, billing by the hour, at an hourly rate of at least $250 per hour, made gobs and gobs of money off this litigation. So don’t let that old standard line about the only winners in this litigation is the plaintiff’s attorneys fool you. The lawyers representing GM and the corporate world, with tens, if not hundreds of lawyers working for them on just this litigation, make out like bandits. And behind closed doors they will tell you they rely on litigation like this to make the huge incomes necessary to keep the lawyers for GM going.
Subscribe
Contact Us
Local: 205-977-8999
Toll Free: 1-866-977-4LAW
(1-866-977-4529)Contact Us Online
Topics
- About Me
- Alabama Accidents
- Byetta
- Cars
- Child Car Seats
- Consumer Products
- Consumer Produts
- Drugs
- FDA Recalls
- Heparin
- Hydroxycut
- Medical Devices
- Nexium
- Orlistat/Alli/Xenical
- Other Products
- Peanut Butter Recall
- Pharmaceutical Companies
- Plavix
- Preemption
- Prilosec
- Raptiva
- Recalls of the Week
- Recommended Websites/Blogs
- Risperdal
- Seroquel
- Singulair
- Solo Practice University
- SSRI/Anti-Depressants
- Surgical Mesh
- Trasylol
- Uncategorized
- Vytorin
- Zyprexa
Search This Blog
Recommended Links
Recent Entries
- March 24, 2011
American Academy of Pediatrics and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Issue New Child Car Seat Guidelines
This week, the American Academy of Pediatrics, with the blessing of the…
- January 17, 2011
Another Johnson & Johnson Recall—-When Will It End???
Late last Friday, Johnson & Johnson’s McNeil Consumer Healthcare unit issued a…
- June 25, 2010
2 Million Cribs Are Recalled Due to Concerns of Entrapment and Suffocation
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced that 7 crib manufacturers have…
- April 21, 2010
Consumer Reports Addresses Recall of Lexus GX and Value of Electronic Stability Control in Cars
Toyota has seen its share of problems as of recent. Unintended acceleration,…
- April 8, 2010
Chinese Drywall Update: Consumer Products Safety Commission Says Gut the Homes & Federal Judge Awards Families $2.6 Million
Some good news this week for those living in anguish with their…
- March 24, 2011
Archives
Legal Blogs
- Illinois Personal Injury Lawyer Blog (Donald W. Fohrman)
- Tennessee Injury Lawyer Blog (Baker Associates)
- Nolo's Fundraising Tips for Busy Nonprofits (Nolo)
- Alabama Injury Attorneys Blog (Farris Riley & Pitt)
- inter alia (Tom Mighell)
- Kaiser Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog (Moseley Collins)
- San Diego Injury Lawyer Blog (Jurewitz Law Group)
- California Injury Attorney Blog (Steven Peck)
- Alabama Consumer Law Blog (Watts Law Group & M. Stan Herring)
- Alabama Injury Lawyer Blog (Steven D. Eversole)
- Alabama Injury Attorney Blog (Martinson & Beason)
- Alabama Injury Lawyers Blog (Cusimano, Keener, Roberts, Knowles & Raley)
- Alabama Insurance And Construction Law Blog (Gregory E. Vaughan)
- Massachusetts Injury Lawyer Blog (Kathy Jo Cook)
- Arizona Accident Lawyer Blog (Breyer Law Offices)
- Responsive Law Blog (Consumers for a Responsive Legal System)
- North Carolina Workers' Compensation Lawyers Blog (Lee Law Offices)
- Birmingham Injury Blog (Watts Law Group & M. Stan Herring)
- DePuy Hip Lawyer (Bradley Law Firm)
- Justia Legal Marketing Blog (Ken Chan & Tim Stanley)
- Ernie the Attorney (Ernest Svenson)
- Texas Injury Lawyer Blog (Earl Drott)
- Sexual Abuse Claims Blog (Arnold Pizzo McKiggan)
- Los Angeles Injury Lawyer Blog (Rudman Law Firm)
- Alabama Car Accident Lawyer Blog (Martinson & Beason)
- Illinois Truck Accident Lawyer Blog (Levin & Perconti)
- Alabama DUI Lawyer Blog (Steven D. Eversole)

Hi I’m looking for some help. my truck is currently in the GM shop for yet another problem with blown gaskets due to this coolant. I paid $1830.79 in Dec. 2006 was told coolant was leaking into my rear differential, because of blown gaskets. I had to have a rear differential overhaul.
Then again in Dec 2007, My vehicle was overheating. When I checked my radiator, I noticed a thick black sludge on my radiator cap. I was told I had a manifold gasket leak which ended up costing me $2085.
My engine light came on monday.Aug. 11th I checked my radiator and it had the same black sludge as before. I was near an auto parts store , close to my home, whom ran a computer diaognostic and said i had a blown head gasket but it was safe to drive to a repair shop as soon as possible. I took my truck and dropped it off at the dealership that night.
I am now told this was not the same gasket and will not be repaired with out an additional $1800.00. I am towing my truck home in peices. Please help me